Berkeley :: essays research papers

5. Explain and rate Berkeleys most coercive reasons for thinking that things other than straitss have no absolute reality altogether apart from or fissiparous of souls.Metaphysics is the field of operations of the ultimate nature of reality and deals with what is truly real as tally to what appears to be real. Berkeley is an idealist who accepts that things other than objects have no absolute public altogether apart from or fencesitter of reasons. He has several arguments b arely only when if the coincidence argument and the inconceivability argument will be discussed, as they are the most herculean reasons for thinking this. I guess that Berkeley proves his theory of absolute existence must(prenominal)(prenominal) be dependent on the mind through proportion and inconceivability.Realists see what is ultimately real is independent from the mind and possess the primary qualities such as extension, shape, solidity and accomplishment regardless of being conceived . This is opposite from Berkeleys and other idealists views. Berkeley does not gestate that these primary qualities are the only things that define existence. Secondary qualities include colours, sounds, odors, and tastes must also be present. Secondary qualities are mind dependent and they are perceptions. These qualities are very important in Berkeleys discussion on existence with respect to resemblance and inconceivability.One of Berkeleys most powerful reasons for absolute existence is proved through the resemblance argument. He believes that only something opticly experienced can be similar a optic experience, so ideas gibe other ideas. He continues to say ideas are mind dependent so no ideas can jibe qualities of a mind independent idea with respect to gumption experience. For example, the idea of a unicorn is mind-dependent and resembles unicorns from fairytales as a horse with a horn. If there were never a whizz experience with a unicorn, no ideas would resemble the q ualities. Berkeley states I appeal to every one whether it be sense to assert a colour is bid something which is invisible hard or soft, like something which is intangible and so of the rest. We no what is hard because we have experiences with objects that are harder, softer, or the same. Betrand Russell objects to Berkeleys notion of resemblance with two things, the first being that ideas represent reality by interpret reality not resembling it, and second, experiences only correspond to the idea, they do not resemble it. Take a scenic picture, looking at the picture, one would be able to tell what objects are closer or further outside(predicate) only when the picture is flat, not 3d.Berkeley essays research papers 5. Explain and judge Berkeleys most powerful reasons for thinking that things other than minds have no absolute existence altogether apart from or independent of minds.Metaphysics is the reckon of the ultimate nature of reality and deals with what is truly real as respond to what appears to be real. Berkeley is an idealist who believes that things other than minds have no absolute existence altogether apart from or independent of minds. He has several arguments but only the resemblance argument and the inconceivability argument will be discussed, as they are the most powerful reasons for thinking this. I believe that Berkeley proves his theory of absolute existence must be dependent on the mind through resemblance and inconceivability.Realists believe what is ultimately real is independent from the mind and possess the primary qualities such as extension, shape, solidity and apparent movement regardless of being conceived. This is opposite from Berkeleys and other idealists views. Berkeley does not believe that these primary qualities are the only things that define existence. Secondary qualities include colours, sounds, odors, and tastes must also be present. Secondary qualities are mind dependent and they are perceptions. These qualit ies are very important in Berkeleys discussion on existence with respect to resemblance and inconceivability.One of Berkeleys most powerful reasons for absolute existence is proved through the resemblance argument. He believes that only something visually experienced can be like a visual experience, so ideas resemble other ideas. He continues to say ideas are mind dependent so no ideas can resemble qualities of a mind independent idea with respect to sense experience. For example, the idea of a unicorn is mind-dependent and resembles unicorns from fairytales as a horse with a horn. If there were never a sense experience with a unicorn, no ideas would resemble the qualities. Berkeley states I appeal to every one whether it be sense to assert a colour is like something which is invisible hard or soft, like something which is intangible and so of the rest. We no what is hard because we have experiences with objects that are harder, softer, or the same. Betrand Russell objects to Berkel eys notion of resemblance with two things, the first being that ideas represent reality by mapping reality not resembling it, and second, experiences only correspond to the idea, they do not resemble it. Take a scenic picture, looking at the picture, one would be able to tell what objects are closer or further away but the picture is flat, not 3d.

Education In Britain During The 18th Century :: essays research papers

development in Britain during the Eighteenth CenturyIn Britain now a geezerhood every child must go to give instruction to further their education. However, it was not like that in the eighteenth speed of light. The little fortunate were not as educated because they could not afford to adopt their children go to instruct. Girls had less of a chance to go to shoal than boys. only as the eighteenth century went on different types of indoctrinates were established for children, adolescents, and adults. 1 type of these new schools were almsgiving schools. Charity schools were established in the blood of the century. These schools were for boys and girls of the working lower class, The principal(prenominal) idea was to teach these children religion, and how to read and write. The children were likewise taught thing that would benefit them as a social class much(prenominal) as cobbling shoes, carpentry, and shuck plaiting. On occasions the crafts that the children made we re change to help the school. By 1740 in that respect were close to 2000 charity schools in england1. In the summer Children would go to school from five or six in the morning to eight or nine at night. In the wintertime the day went from six or s flat in the morning until seven or eight at night. Children did not have to go to school if they did not wish to. It was big(a) to get children from the countries to go to school receivable to the fact that their parents wanted them to confine at home in the field helping to pay for their family in act. most 1780 Sunday schools came around. Like Charity schools they taught religion. They started because many a(prenominal) people believed that even overworked children be to get an education2. Another type of school that was established were the private schools. cliquish and dissenting academies existed for those who were excluded other schools3 due to their unearthly beliefs. Britain created a modern educational system that taugh t mainly commercial subjects for the boys such as surveying, and European languages.Schools advertise and competed wish each other for students to come to their school. Schools would try and appear repair by having plays and musical nights. Some schools even offered Military education. However, competitive sports did not exist in the eighteenth century. just about 1759 girls could finally go to school with the boys. However, their education was not thought to be important.Education In Britain During The 18th Century essays research papers Education in Britain during the Eighteenth CenturyIn Britain now a days every child must go to school to further their education. However, it was not like that in the eighteenth century. The less fortunate were not as educated because they could not afford to have their children go to school. Girls had less of a chance to go to school than boys. But as the eighteenth century went on different types of schools were established for children, adol escents, and adults.One type of these new schools were Charity schools. Charity schools were established in the beginning of the century. These schools were for boys and girls of the working lower class, The main idea was to teach these children religion, and how to read and write. The children were also taught thing that would benefit them as a social class such as cobbling shoes, carpentry, and straw plaiting. On occasions the crafts that the children made were sold to help the school. By 1740 there were close to 2000 charity schools in england1. In the summer Children would go to school from five or six in the morning to eight or nine at night. In the winter the day went from six or seven in the morning until seven or eight at night. Children did not have to go to school if they did not wish to. It was hard to get children from the countries to go to school due to the fact that their parents wanted them to stay at home in the fields helping to pay for their family income.Around 1 780 Sunday schools came around. Like Charity schools they taught religion. They started because many people believed that even overworked children deserved to get an education2. Another type of school that was established were the private schools. Private and dissenting academies existed for those who were excluded other schools3 due to their religious beliefs. Britain created a modern educational system that taught mainly commercial subjects for the boys such as surveying, and European languages.Schools advertised and competed wish each other for students to come to their school. Schools would try and appear better by having plays and musical nights. Some schools even offered Military education. However, competitive sports did not exist in the eighteenth century.Around 1759 girls could finally go to school with the boys. However, their education was not thought to be important.

Human Beings as the Puppets of Society Essay -- Papers Behavior Sociol

Human Beings as the Puppets of Society Sociologists have long argued about whether or not we ar controlled by the structure of the ordering in which we live, in other words, atomic number 18 we or ar we not puppets of company. Social structure theorists such as Functionalists and conflict theorists like Marxists, believe that we are puppets and that our behaviour is controlled by the structure of the society in which we live. Both theories suggest that people are controlled by society but this argument is opposed by social action theorists such as Symbolic Interactionists who believe that society is created by the individuals themselves. To show far it can be argued that human beings are puppets of society this essay will olfactory sensation at functionalism and social control by the family, Marxism and social control within the education system and then look at the opposing theory of Symbolic Interactionism. It is also intended to hash out the recent structuration theory of Giddens who argues that these theories are no longer valid in determining if we are puppets because both structure and action are undeniable for society to exist and thus in some instances in our lives we are puppets and others we are not. According to Jones, Functionalists like Durkheim find human behaviour as learned behaviour(2004, p.6), in other words everything we know and do has to be taught to us given that when we are born we have no knowledge of anything. They argue that all our behaviour is learnt through the socialisation process. Functionalists consider that primary socialisation is the basis to learning the norms, values and roles of society and... ...eeded, so it could be argued, therefore, that even though at times we are stop agents and have an individual choice in our actions we are also puppets of society because of the many of the structures of society. References List Czerniawski, G., 2004. What is the Role of Education? Sociology Review, 14 (2), 24-25 Giddens, A., 2002. Sociology. 4th ed. economy Press Jones, P., 2004. Introducing Social Theory. Cambridge Polity Press Wilson, A., 1985. Society Now Family. capital of the United Kingdom Tavistock Publications Bibliography Moore, S., 2001. Sociology Alive. 3rd ed. Cheltenham Nelson Thornes Ltd Haralambos and Holborn, 2000. Sociology Themes and Perspectives. 5th ed. London Collins Educational Bauman Z & whitethorn T., 2003. Thinking Sociologically. 2nd ed. London Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Exchange to ne Hardware :: essays research papers

If you scarce want to do an in-place hike of supplant 2000 to central 2003 using the uniform server, youve got it make Microsoft has excuseed the sue of upgrading and made it pretty sincere. Even if youre mum using Exchange v5.5, Microsoft has you cover with a wealth of documentation to peruse. plainly what if youre an Exchange 2000 agreement that wants to bring in a youthful Exchange 2003 dodging aboard your alert machine, move all your subject field over to it, and decommission the professional box? Then youre left(p) scratching your head. At the meter of this writing, there is no guide Ive been able to find that explains the process with any detail.This document exit explain the process, combining information from many sources as well as my hold experience. Its very favourable to bring Exchange legion 2003 into your Exchange 2000 organization, with minimal disruption to your existing server or your users. This document assumes you nominate an Exchange 2000 organization ladder in native mode.Henceforth, the Exchange 2000 establishment give be referred to as the old server, and the Exchange 2003 governing body will be referred to as the bleak server.I. Prepare your Network for Windows server 2003 disregarding of how you intend to get to Exchange 2003, there are some grassroots steps that must be done.1.Begin by reviewing Microsofts 314649 Windows Server 2003 adprep /forestprep Command Causes Mangled Attributes in Windows 2000 Forests That Contain Exchange 2000 Servers This article explains that if you vex Exchange 2000 installed in your organization, and you hold back with installing your first Windows Server 2003 system (and its accompanying schema modifications), you whitethorn end up with some iron out attributes in AD. Preventing this from happening is simple enough a script called Inetorgpersonfix.ldf will do the trick. 2. bunk adprep /forestprep from Windows Server 2003 CD on your Windows 2000 server that holds the abst ract master FSMO role. (Of course youll unavoidableness to be a member of dodging Admins). Be sure to replicate the changes throughout the forest before proceeding. 3.Run adprep /domainprep from Windows Server 2003 CD on your Windows 2000 server. I ran it on the system place the PDC Emulator FSMO role. 4.Before legal transfer a new Windows Server 2003 system online, its a hefty idea to review your third-party server utilities and heave them to the latest versions to ensure compatibility. In my installation, this included the latest versions of BackupExec, Symantec Antivirus Corp.Exchange to ne Hardware essays research papers If you simply want to do an in-place upgrade of Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2003 using the same server, youve got it made Microsoft has explained the process of upgrading and made it pretty simple. Even if youre still using Exchange v5.5, Microsoft has you covered with a wealth of documentation to peruse. But what if youre an Exchange 2000 organization that wants to bring in a new Exchange 2003 system alongside your existing machine, move all your content over to it, and decommission the original box? Then youre left scratching your head. At the time of this writing, there is no guide Ive been able to find that explains the process with any detail.This document will explain the process, combining information from numerous sources as well as my own experience. Its very easy to bring Exchange Server 2003 into your Exchange 2000 organization, with minimal disruption to your existing server or your users. This document assumes you have an Exchange 2000 organization running in native mode.Henceforth, the Exchange 2000 system will be referred to as the old server, and the Exchange 2003 system will be referred to as the new server.I. Prepare your Network for Windows Server 2003Regardless of how you intend to get to Exchange 2003, there are some basic steps that must be done.1.Begin by reviewing Microsofts 314649 Windows Server 2003 adpr ep /forestprep Command Causes Mangled Attributes in Windows 2000 Forests That Contain Exchange 2000 Servers This article explains that if you have Exchange 2000 installed in your organization, and you proceed with installing your first Windows Server 2003 system (and its accompanying schema modifications), you may end up with some mangled attributes in AD. Preventing this from happening is simple enough a script called Inetorgpersonfix.ldf will do the trick. 2.Run adprep /forestprep from Windows Server 2003 CD on your Windows 2000 server that holds the Schema master FSMO role. (Of course youll need to be a member of Schema Admins). Be sure to replicate the changes throughout the forest before proceeding. 3.Run adprep /domainprep from Windows Server 2003 CD on your Windows 2000 server. I ran it on the system holding the PDC Emulator FSMO role. 4.Before bringing a new Windows Server 2003 system online, its a good idea to review your third-party server utilities and upgrade them to the latest versions to ensure compatibility. In my installation, this included the latest versions of BackupExec, Symantec Antivirus Corp.

Battered Women Syndrome Essay -- essays research papers

Battered Woman Syndrome     In Robert Agnews general filter theory, he talks about how descent and stress could cause an soulfulness to commit crimes that they wouldnt have committed without those circumstances. In his theory, he refers to blackball affectional states, which are the "anger, frustration, and adverse emotions that emerge in the wake of destructive kind relationships". It is these negative affective states that are produced by strain. Agnew acknowledges that strain can be caused by negative situations, such as abuse or neglect, family conflict, or stressful life events. These situations can all be found to be extremely prevalent in households where domestic violence occurs. According to this theory, the negative stimuli presented causes, in this case, the woman to feel angry, frustrated, disappointed, depressed, and fearful. These negative feelings, in turn, are externally expressed through violence. In this paper, we will look at bea ten-up woman syndrome as a theory that has stemmed from Robert Agnews general strain theory. In her 1979 book "The Battered Woman" Dr. Lenore Walker first came up with what is now know as battered woman syndrome. Put hardly battered woman syndrome, or BWS as it is sometimes called, is a group of psychological symptoms that are easily recognized in women who have been physically, sexually, or psychologically assaulted by their domestic partner. According to Dr. Walker, "Battered w...

Hamartia in Oedipus the King :: Greek Tragedy Tragedies Oedipus Essays

Hamartia in Oedipus the King According to Aristotle, the sad hero is impeded by a distinguishable characteristic or character trait which current of airs to his ultimate dying. This trait is known as hamartia, or the tragic brand. This characteristic is said to not only lead to the heros demise but may also enable the reader to sympathize with the character. So it follows that in Oedipus the King, a Greek tragedy, the tragic hero Oedipus should have rough sort of flaw. However, after pixilated examination of the text, no distinguishable flaw is revealed. Although Oedipus appears to have many flaws on the surface, namely his poor temperament, c belessness, curiosity and pride, close examination of the text reveals that he has many touchmingly flawed characteristics that are not only justifiable but in some cases to be expected. One might expect that a quick and even bloody temper would be considered a serious impediment to Oedipus. However, he is kinda justified in his rage against Creon and Tiresias, and he has good reasons to suspect them of plotting against him. From the visualize point of Oedipus, he has just discovered that the antecedent king Laius was viciously murdered along with the members of his entourage. Furthermore the murder has yet to be resolved many years later, and the gods have placed a plague on his city until the murderer(s) is apprehended and punished. After learning of the death of Laius, Oedipus concludes that the murderer is a thief, so daring, so wild, hed kill a king? Its impossible, unless conspirators paid him come to in Thebes (140-142). Creon concurs that this thought had also crossed his mind. So with this evidence, it is easy to see why Oedipus is distrustful of his own peers. Maybe the actual killing of Laius and his quaternary servants is an extreme display of Oedipus murderous temperament. While it may seem a bit extreme in hindsight, at the time of the incident his actions are totally justifiable. Oedipus descr ibes the incident as thus as he was make his way toward this triple crossroad he began to see a herald, then a brace of colts drawing a wagon, and mounted on the bench . . . a man, just as Jocasta described Laius, coming face-to-face, and the genius in the lead and the old man himself was about to thrust him off the road-brute force - and the one shouldering him aside, the driver, he struck him in anger - and the old man, watching Oedipus coming up along his wheels - he brings down his prod, two prongs straight at his straits(884-893).

Service Desk :: Personal Narrative Writing

Service DeskI insure myself working at the Service Desk about noon on a sunlight afternoon. The Church Rush has begun. People with their three piece suits and Sunday dresses on all rally to shop. Then this mankind and his daughter come in and the dreaded happens. They have a video game, that is opened, with a receipt. integrity of the toughest situations to deal with. The account, in extreme fibers, goes like thisHi, I put forward.Hello, Id like to return this. Here is the receipt, the guest replies. I see that it is Mario political party for the Nintendo 64 and it is opened.Okay, I provoke exchange this for another copy of Mario company, I say.I dont want another copy. It was to toilsome for my kid, the guest says.Well, overdue to copyright law issued by the Federal political science I cannot refund your money or issue an exchange however for an exact copy of this game, I explain.I never have had a problem with returns before at this store, the guest tells you.One moment , I say as I go get the return policy pamphlet. I then point out the give voice which applies to the situation.Well this says I can return electronics with a receipt, says the guest as they point to a divers(prenominal) section of the return policy.In certain instances it is that easy, but in this case I can issue you another copy of Mario Party due to copyright, I say.Well, I shop here(predicate) every week. I deprave stuff for home, the office, and gifts. Ive never had a problem before. Are you telltale(a) me I just threw away $55?? retorts the guest in an idle manner.Im sorry, would you like to speak with the manager? I ask. That phrase is one of my favorite questions in a situation such as this.Yes, I do exclaims the guest. I turn around and pick up the walkie-talkie and call for the Lead on Duty.LOD can you come to the do desk? I speak in to the walkie.Be there in a minute, the walkie says back with Brians voice.As I stand there the gentlemans little daughter says in the cutest little voice, If we buy something here and have the receipt we can return it. I just scene at her then at her father a give a brief smile. The time it takes the LOD to arrive at the service desk seems like an eternity.